Deleted Pages Are Non Recoverable, Similar Posts
Sunday, October 18, 2015
Edit
Blog owners occasionally delete weblog content, too after modify their mind.
Some weblog owners similar to educate a weblog using static pages - too this presents a chip to a greater extent than of a challenge, when a static page is deleted.
Searching for a deleted static page is non the same equally searching for a deleted post.
Static pages are non easily searchable - nor are they cached, equally often. They are called "static", for a reason.
Static pages don't seem inwards newsfeeds.
Blog posts seem inwards the "blog posts feeds". There is no "blog pages feeds", because static pages are non designed to seem inwards newsfeeds.
Static pages mostly don't seem inwards sitemaps.
Blogger provides the pages sitemap, for optional use. Not many weblog owners volition host pregnant amounts of content, that needs indexing, on static pages. Many weblog owners (I am one) host content that is non intended for indexing, using static pages.
Static pages can't last indexed using Blogger right away searches.
Static pages practise non purpose labels - then they cannot last indexed inwards the "/search" department of the weblog structure. If y'all desire to search static pages, you'll accept to use a cached / custom search.
The bottom line.
If y'all host pregnant weblog content on a static page, it may last indexed inwards a cache - only it will, virtually likely, last indexed less frequently. Let's examine this example, from The Wayback Machine.
The static page was cached five times. The blog, inwards general, was cached sixteen times.
The static page was cached five times.
The earliest re-create would last 2013, too the latest 2014.
The weblog was cached sixteen times.
The earliest re-create would last 2012, too the latest 2015.
When y'all cry back deleted content, y'all desire to cry back the virtually recent usable re-create of the content. Content cached sixteen times is significantly to a greater extent than probable to hit a usable copy, than content cached five times. And whatever copies made inwards 2015 volition last to a greater extent than upwardly to date, than copies inwards 2014.
And the Wayback Machine has non been known to accept every weblog too website cached. If there's no cache, nosotros mightiness accept to await at cached weblog feed - too weblog feed is alone available for posts. Static pages are non published, inwards the weblog posts feed.
All inwards all, if y'all always ask to recover deleted weblog content, you're going to accept a amend direct chances of success if the content was a postal service - too non a page.
How practise I recover a post, after I deleted it from my blog?Sometimes, knowing the URL - or at to the lowest degree the championship - of a post, nosotros tin cry back the postal service from the Blogger database. In other cases, it may last possible to cry back postal service content from a cached newsfeed.
Some weblog owners similar to educate a weblog using static pages - too this presents a chip to a greater extent than of a challenge, when a static page is deleted.
Searching for a deleted static page is non the same equally searching for a deleted post.
Static pages are non easily searchable - nor are they cached, equally often. They are called "static", for a reason.
- They don't seem inwards newsfeeds.
- They mostly don't seem inwards sitemaps.
- They can't last indexed using Blogger right away searches.
Static pages don't seem inwards newsfeeds.
Blog posts seem inwards the "blog posts feeds". There is no "blog pages feeds", because static pages are non designed to seem inwards newsfeeds.
Static pages mostly don't seem inwards sitemaps.
Blogger provides the pages sitemap, for optional use. Not many weblog owners volition host pregnant amounts of content, that needs indexing, on static pages. Many weblog owners (I am one) host content that is non intended for indexing, using static pages.
Static pages can't last indexed using Blogger right away searches.
Static pages practise non purpose labels - then they cannot last indexed inwards the "/search" department of the weblog structure. If y'all desire to search static pages, you'll accept to use a cached / custom search.
The bottom line.
If y'all host pregnant weblog content on a static page, it may last indexed inwards a cache - only it will, virtually likely, last indexed less frequently. Let's examine this example, from The Wayback Machine.
The static page was cached five times. The blog, inwards general, was cached sixteen times.
The static page was cached five times.
The earliest re-create would last 2013, too the latest 2014.
Related:
The weblog was cached sixteen times.
The earliest re-create would last 2012, too the latest 2015.
When y'all cry back deleted content, y'all desire to cry back the virtually recent usable re-create of the content. Content cached sixteen times is significantly to a greater extent than probable to hit a usable copy, than content cached five times. And whatever copies made inwards 2015 volition last to a greater extent than upwardly to date, than copies inwards 2014.
And the Wayback Machine has non been known to accept every weblog too website cached. If there's no cache, nosotros mightiness accept to await at cached weblog feed - too weblog feed is alone available for posts. Static pages are non published, inwards the weblog posts feed.
All inwards all, if y'all always ask to recover deleted weblog content, you're going to accept a amend direct chances of success if the content was a postal service - too non a page.
